Seven reasons why I would not use Rosetta Stone.
Let me begin my saying that I have never used Rosetta Stone. My son, Mark, played professional hockey in Japan for a few years. His team gave him Rosetta Stone to learn Japanese. He tried it and found that it was boring and did not get him very far.
I decided to do some research on the net. Most reviews that I found seemed to have been done by people connected with Rosetta Stone. I am not surprised. Rosetta Stone are excellent marketers for which I salute them. They are not only promoting their product, they are promoting an awareness that people can learn languages on their own.
The best summary of the Rosetta Stone method I found was the following.
The most important component of the Rosetta Stone software-based method
is what I call "a four squares screen". The user is presented with a
page that shows four pictures of various objects or entities. A
prerecorded phrase or word is played back and the user must click on
the square that contains a visual answer to the question or best
illustrates the concept. If the user answers correctly a little "ding"
is heard, a check-mark appears on the screen and the program advances.
That's all folks!
So, why does the Rosetta Stone method work? At the very center of the
Rosetta Stone approach is the idea of constant encouragement. Every
step of the way the user receives positive feedback from the program.
Rosetta Stone takes you through a rapid succession of multiple choice
questions. Given that there are only four options per question it is
not difficult to answer every question even if you don't get it right
away. This process turns into a series of gratifying experiences.
This was contrasted with the usual language learning experience where the reviewer felt that we do not know how we are doing.
As a result we have uncertainty, perception of poor performance and general lack of success. A user is much more likely to quit such a course, and it should be known that not quitting is probably the single most important requirement when learning a foreign language
My reaction to the reviews that I read was that I do not think I would want to use Rosetta Stone. Here are seven reasons.
1) I do not like answering multiple choice questions at the computer. It is not communicating. I might do it once or twice but would not continue. I would not do it daily. I need to connect with a language I am learning daily, in order to learn.
2) Most of my learning activity takes place during dead time. I mostly listen while running, driving, doing the dishes, waiting line etc.. I also read while waiting or as a relaxing activity. If I had to sit at the computer in order to learn I would not do a lot of studying. I just do not have the dedicated time.
3) I do not believe that I can permanently learn words, whether using pictures or other techniques. I know I am going to forget them. In a way I am not interested in learning the word for "red" or "house". I know that I have to be exposed to so much language content, in audio and text, that gradually it all starts to have meaning. I am not conscious of learning and forgetting specific words, but I know I am doing it. I know I have learned words because I can understand more and more. I know I am forgetting because I am constantly unable to remember the most elementary words.
4) I find it difficult to learn words and phrases that are divorced from a larger story or context. Isolated words and phrases do not connect with my brain. I remember words and expressions as part of larger stories that I remember. I often remember when and where I was listening to many of these stories.
5) When I start learning a language, the gratification that I experience comes from the fact that I start to be able to tell when words begin and end, and then soon after start to make sense of short episodes that used to be just noise for me. That is all the feedback that I need. I do not find the uncertainty a problem. It is the feeling of the "fog lifting", the uncertainty turning into more and more clarity, that is so satisfying in the study of another language.
6) I learn languages with the goal of being able to communicate, to understand what is said, and to be able to express myself. That is a long road. I have the impression that Rosettta Stone only takes you a very short way. I do not see it as a useful or necessary step.
7) I feel that a lot of listening to interesting content is a better start than doing multiple choice questions. I am in a hurry to engage with the language, real language situations, and to let my brain get used to it.
What has been the experience of others? I know that I am not impartial, but I have tried to be honest. I do recommend the "Teach Yourself" series and the "Colloquial" series. I would not recommend Rosetta Stone.

